The Darkness and revenge – again

!darknessMy cop-out blogs are getting more and more blatant. This one, in fact, is lifted straight from my old blog and dates from June 2009. But I have a good excuse. This weekend (Saturday 26 and Sunday 27), the Kindle version of my novel The Darkness is free in the USA here  and the UK here   and I remembered writing specifically about its genesis and about how a significant part of my reason for writing novels seems to be revenge. This is what I wrote back then.

Recently I was one of several writers pitching their new books to some readers in a lovely wee independent shop in Glasgow called Lost in Fiction (sadly long-since defunct). Anyway, my three-minute pitch went like this:

The question we’re always asked is ‘Where do you get your ideas from?’ In the case of The Darkness, it’s central to how I wrote the first version and how it developed into this one. Many years ago, I was having dinner with my wife and friends at a restaurant just outside Aberdeen. The waiter serving us had a West Country accent – English West Country. I said to him ‘You’re a long way from home’. He said ‘Yes, I needed to get as far away as possible’. I asked why and he told me his wife and two young daughters had been killed by a drunk driver. He’d been caught, sentenced to eighteen months, but got twelve months off for good behaviour. As the waiter said, ‘That’s two months for each life’.

I felt so sorry for him, and the story stayed with me. I wanted revenge on his behalf.

The first version of The Darkness was exactly that. My agent sent it to Piatkus. They liked it but didn’t want a stand alone thriller at that time but said they’d be interested if I had any police procedurals. So I wrote one. They bought it. And I wrote some more.

I started thinking about making The Darkness part of the series, but it was crude. It was me, red in tooth and claw. My own vigilante tendencies bother me. When it comes to capital punishment, imprisonment and so on I’m a liberal, I’ve corresponded with a prisoner on Death Row, and yet I know for a fact that if I could get my hands on some of these paedophiles and so on, I’d do very nasty things to them. And I’d do it knowing it was wrong, but I’d still do it.

So, in the end, I wrote and rewrote The Darkness over and over again, exploring the balance between the law and justice, revenge and compassion. The motives and the personnel changed. It’s now the third Jack Carston novel and it’s taught me so much about my characters and the whole business of crime and punishment that, before I send off the next two, which are already written, I want to change them. Then, there’ll be just one more. I already know its plot and structure and it’ll have an even darker ending than this one.

Given what I’m claiming for the book, it was nice to read in one of the reviews that ‘When you read The Darkness be prepared to be manipulated and have your moral compass reset’. And the same review ended by saying ‘get yourself a copy of The Darkness and ask yourself this; what would you do?’

OK, that was my spiel – and I meant it, and it was true. But yesterday, reading an article about books being made into movies, I suddenly remembered reading First Blood, which is the first of the Rambo stories. I haven’t seen the movies and have no desire to, but that was a well-constructed thriller and a good escapist read. At the end, though, I felt frustrated and cheated by a choice the protagonist made. It was about revenge. But his ‘failure’ to exact the full revenge, while morally ‘correct’, was out of character in the context of the story. This isn’t a criticism of the writing, it’s just my take on the morality involved. I won’t reveal the specific incident to which I’m referring because some people may not have read it so I wouldn’t want to spoil the ending for them.

The point, though, is that it made me want to write a novel in which the revenge impulse was allowed its full scope. I imagine that many if not most people experience the visceral eye-for-an-eye urge and it doesn’t do to pretend that it’s not there. I’m not proposing a free-for-all, but it’s honest to acknowledge that it’s a factor, even in the most liberally-informed debates.

All of which is a pitch for you to go and pick up your free copy of The Darkness this Saturday or Sunday.

 .

0 comments

  1. I loved the idea of pitching your book in a small Glasgow store. I often get the question – how do you come up with ideas? I thought everyone had stories running through their minds.

    1. You’re right, Donna, it does work that way. The secret is to note them down before they disappear. The thing about this particular one is that it stayed with me for ages and almost insisted on being written.

  2. Hi Bill – Sue Price and fellow Author Electric here. I’m even keener to read your book now, after reading this. Is revenge so wrong? Isn’t it ‘wild justice’ – meaning, as I’m sure you will know, ‘natural’ justice.
    Ever read what Bernard Shaw said about capital punishment? He asked why people persisted in dragging notions of punishment and revenge into the argument ‘when they have nothing to do with the case.’ If a venomous snake was at large in your garden, Shaw argued, you would kill the creature before it could do you or yours any harm, but you would not be punishing the snake or taking revenge on it. In the same way, Shaw said, some people are ‘too incorrigibly mischievous’ to be allowed to live. Isn’t it arguable that DNA testing largely removes the argument against capital punishment?

    1. Wow, that’s a huge topic, Sue. Worth a blog on its own. I think the aspect of it that bothered me most as I was writing and rewriting the book was the tension between the visceral, instinctive impulse and the deliberate, premeditated choice. Most of us would be capable of hitting out in a blind rage without deliberate intent to kill, but when we have the leisure to step back and contemplate the consequences, different criteria apply. I’m too much of a wishy-washy liberal to accept that capital punishment can ever be legitimised. Whatever the nature of the condemned person, choosing to murder him/her in cold blood with the sanction of the law makes us more sinister than the person we’re executing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.